You can play Helwaker/Wizard, or Helwaker, or just Wizard any combination is good, but hard to tell it is totally better. If you take weaker class and MC with stronger, the result should be stronger. Even if you run out of resource you can always drop the bomb or scroll it down.ħ0% playe single anyway, so MC power is secret Priest, Wizard, Druid could have line of passives at tier 1-4 "+1 cast on that tier".Īll classes having deep pockets from tier 1, dont be classist, wizards have deep pockets to. Tier VIII passive "can use empowerment twice in combat" is not bad But move upgrades more back.įor martial classes add, move "Zeal on Kill" passive to tier VIIIīuff abillities which sucks (telemetry shows which one)ĭo not random nerf what is not broken. So you can go single, and dont feel you have so many spare level points.įor martial classes with pool (Rogue, Paladin and such) move more active abilities at tier 1, so we could choose else than cripping strike. Generally give each class 30 worthy level points, which work well together. More neutral passives so you can dump redutant levelpoints on something useful Some more passives could be neutral from level 1, could kick toughness here Maybe MC will still be better, but single class will get something good and desired. Make the Cake, at tier VIII and IX make abillities/passives which are good and have capstone vibe. Priest probably deserve own topic with deep and real feedback. It could be better to buff first individual classes as single too each other, and then look at MC. Priests dont really have so many situacional spells to choose from. But could dump levelpoints on: secondary damage type, life draining spell, single target, CC option, personal defense. In comparison Wizards have 18 free spells, many more deity lists, and could swap them mid combat. Paladin/Chanter/Lifegiver +/Priest is not bad as support. Heals&Buffs is good for MC, since you dont care for powerlevel. So when MC you just dump your level points on something useful.ĥ. You dont have passives to spend levelpoints. ![]() And whole tiers (like 5th) are questionable.Ĥ. You dont have too many spells to choose from.ģ. Selection of spells is smaller than wizard. Holy Radiance is not that strong, and does not change with deity.Ģ. Priest is interesting example, since it is not the best class.ġ. 6s of casting ? 3s of casting time ! You can buff far quicker ! Good !Ģ) +1 spell ressource by spell level. = eventual interrest of single class)ġ) Casting time / 2 for single. ![]() (was not the case with devotion for the faithful at 20 accuracy. ![]() Each level of spell don't changing the world. To conclude, there is absolutely no argument to take a single priest. (If I have 999 differents spells and only 2 uses.) I have understand a lot of thing.Ģ) I have 2 spells to cast (ressources) by spell level (1 to 9).ģ) I have more spell to choose than multiclass each level up.Ĥ) I have the same number of ressource (2) than multiclass.Ĥ) But number of spell is opposite to number of possible uses. I know it was bad but I still tested it completely. I just finished a playthrough with a lot of single.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |